ထႅမ်းပလဵတ်ႉ:According to whom
 | ထႅမ်းပလဵတ်ႉ ဢၼ်ၼႆႉ လႆႈၸႂ်ႉဝႆႉ တီႈၼႃႈလိၵ်ႈ မွၵ်ႈ 4,600 ၼႃႈလိၵ်ႈ လႄႈ လွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႈၸိူဝ်းၼႆႉ တေႁႂ်ႈၽၢင်ႉမႅၼ်ႈၺႃး ၵႂၢင်ႈၵႂၢင်ႈၶႂၢင်ၶႂၢင်။ ၸၢမ်းတူၺ်း လွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႈ တီႈၼႂ်း ထႅမ်းပလဵတ်ႉ's /sandbox ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် ၼႃႈလိၵ်ႈၽႄ /testcases , ဢမ်ႇၼၼ် တီႈၼႂ်း ၼႃႈလိၵ်ႈၽႄ ၽူႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း။ ဝူၼ်ႉသွၼ်ႇ ဢုပ်ႇဢူဝ်း လွင်ႈလႅၵ်ႈလၢႆႈ တီႈၼႂ်း ၼႃႈလိၵ်ႈ တႃႇဢုပ်ႇ ၽွင်းမိူဝ်ႈပႆႇ ၵေႃႇသၢင်ႈၶဝ်ၼၼ်ႉ။
ႁူဝ်ၼပ်ႉ လွင်ႈၶဝ်ႈပႃးၼႆႉ မၼ်းႁဵတ်းဢၢပ်ႉတဵတ်ႉဝႆႉႁင်းမၼ်း (တူၺ်းတီႈ ၽိုၼ်လိၵ်ႈ)။ |
လွင်ႈၸႂ်ႉတိုဝ်း
[မႄးထတ်းငဝ်ႈငႃႇ]You may append a date to the template in the following format:
{{According to whom|date=ၸၼ်ႇဝႃႇရီႇ 2026}}
The template may also be used to highlight the questionable passage in the text:
- "The moon is considered to have
{{According to whom|water, cream cheese}}and potato salad." produces
- "The moon is considered to have water, cream cheese[ၸွမ်းၼင်ႇၽႂ်?] and potato salad."
မိူဝ်ႈလႂ်တေလႆႈၸႂ်ႉ
[မႄးထတ်းငဝ်ႈငႃႇ]This tag is for placement after mention of a vague, third-party claim that is not sourced, such as "considered", "noted as", "nicknamed", "lauded as the world's [best/largest/finest/etc.]", "labeled", and the like.
Use this tag when no specific examples of identifiable individuals or groups are named who could be used to verify the statements or beliefs that appear in the tagged passage of the article.
Do not use this tag for material that is already supported by an inline citation. If you want to know who holds that view, all you have to do is look at the source named at the end of the sentence or paragraph. It is not necessary to inquire "According to whom?" in that circumstance.
Alternatives
[မႄးထတ်းငဝ်ႈငႃႇ]- Sometimes, the offending statement should be made more specific by using in-text attribution to identify particular individuals who hold this position, and then either supplied with an inline citation showing that this person or group holds this position, or tagged as needing citation.
- Extremely vague statements ("Alice Expert enjoys broad support") should normally be removed.
- Unsourced statements that say or imply something controversial about a living person should be removed immediately.
- Do not use this tag if naming the individuals who hold a position would be silly because of the number. Facts that are widely held should be asserted as simple facts. Do not use in-text attribution to imply that a widely held view is a minority position. Thus, we write simply that "The Earth is round", not "Scientists like Suren Ayvazyan, Teki Biçoku, Donald Canfield, Ricardo Cirera, Hartley T. Ferrar, Nicolae Frolov, Khandaker Mosharraf Hossain, Manuel Santillán (and about a million others) say that the Earth is round."
This tag will categorize tagged articles into Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases.
ၶေႃႈမုၼ်းထႅမ်းပလဵတ်ႉ
[မႄးထတ်းငဝ်ႈငႃႇ]Inline cleanup tag clarifying that attribution of a claim is needed
| Parameter | ၶေႃႈသပ်းလႅင်း | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| content | 1 | Span of content needing clarification | Content | optional |
| Date | date | Month and year the template was added
| Date | suggested |
တူၺ်းပႃး
[မႄးထတ်းငဝ်ႈငႃႇ]- {{Peacock}} – message-box
- {{Weasel}} – message-box
- {{Compared to?}}
- Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup § Neutrality and factual accuracy
Redirects to this template
|
|---|
|
